Vicious dog lays down in front of vice squad, who then shoot it.
- Mesarthim
- Lhümbergø
- Posts: 21074
- Joined: 16 Apr 2009, 08:49
- Location: Birdtown, Minnesota
Vicious dog lays down in front of vice squad, who then shoot it.
[youtube]4kJVnA5KXJw[/youtube]
you can fast forward to 4:20. both of these idiots deserve to lose their jobs (one for performing the action and the other for not doing anything to stop him). they had it in the snatcher already and decide to shot it? sorry there is no excuse for this.
you can fast forward to 4:20. both of these idiots deserve to lose their jobs (one for performing the action and the other for not doing anything to stop him). they had it in the snatcher already and decide to shot it? sorry there is no excuse for this.
- Abzu
- Postwhore
- Posts: 45528
- Joined: 17 Apr 2009, 08:35
- Location: next door
Re: Vicious dog lays down in front of vice squad, who then shoot it.
They should be fucking shot in return.
;,,;ANGEL OF DESEASE wrote:the path of whoring is something wicked and grim, and very philosophical.
- Devy
- Metal God
- Posts: 8634
- Joined: 17 Apr 2009, 01:04
Re: Vicious dog lays down in front of vice squad, who then shoot it.
[quote name="Lumbergh"]both of these idiots deserve to lose their jobs[/quote]
You mean they haven't already? If they did this to a human being then losing their jobs would be the least of their worries. It may well have transpired that if they had taken the dog in it would only have been put down anyway. Or it may have been rehomed. Stupid bastards.
You mean they haven't already? If they did this to a human being then losing their jobs would be the least of their worries. It may well have transpired that if they had taken the dog in it would only have been put down anyway. Or it may have been rehomed. Stupid bastards.
[quote name="ANGEL OF DESEASE"]He is going to paint with brown colour the name of Morbid Angel. The colour of the shit of course.[/quote]
[quote name="Ninny"]There was a whistling fat woman at the bus stop, I had to walk away[/quote]
[quote name="Ninny"]There was a whistling fat woman at the bus stop, I had to walk away[/quote]
- Verbal
- The Melancholy Wizards
- Posts: 25051
- Joined: 18 Apr 2009, 03:05
Re: Vicious dog lays down in front of vice squad, who then shoot it.
abortionists kill human babies all the time......they dont lose their jobs
- Abzu
- Postwhore
- Posts: 45528
- Joined: 17 Apr 2009, 08:35
- Location: next door
Re: Vicious dog lays down in front of vice squad, who then shoot it.
They kill fetuses that have not yet been born. Your argument is a shit.
;,,;ANGEL OF DESEASE wrote:the path of whoring is something wicked and grim, and very philosophical.
- Verbal
- The Melancholy Wizards
- Posts: 25051
- Joined: 18 Apr 2009, 03:05
Re: Vicious dog lays down in front of vice squad, who then shoot it.
are abortions allowed after 22-24 week age?
- Abzu
- Postwhore
- Posts: 45528
- Joined: 17 Apr 2009, 08:35
- Location: next door
Re: Vicious dog lays down in front of vice squad, who then shoot it.
There's no general answer to that. Go dig up various countries laws and, for the US, state laws and guidelines on abortion. Personally, I think the cap should be 18 weeks, but I'm not a prenatal development expert.
;,,;ANGEL OF DESEASE wrote:the path of whoring is something wicked and grim, and very philosophical.
- Verbal
- The Melancholy Wizards
- Posts: 25051
- Joined: 18 Apr 2009, 03:05
Re: Vicious dog lays down in front of vice squad, who then shoot it.
given the fact people dont seem to value the lives other animals much, some of which are surely in the same league of intelligence as dogs (ie animals killed for food and sport etc), surely getting all emotionally oldryan at that video above is a little doublestandardish? at least is the disproportionate response people have to some animals being killed/mistreated versus others apparent?
and we dont know the history of that dog. isnt it generally accepted that if they attack a human or something they get put down? maybe that dog was a complete shit. deciding he wasnt based on that video is a bit like watching a video of sadam being walked out and executed and thinking "why the hell are they doing that? he seems perferctly agreeable"
and we dont know the history of that dog. isnt it generally accepted that if they attack a human or something they get put down? maybe that dog was a complete shit. deciding he wasnt based on that video is a bit like watching a video of sadam being walked out and executed and thinking "why the hell are they doing that? he seems perferctly agreeable"
- Abzu
- Postwhore
- Posts: 45528
- Joined: 17 Apr 2009, 08:35
- Location: next door
Re: Vicious dog lays down in front of vice squad, who then shoot it.
[quote name="Verbal"]given the fact people dont seem to value the lives other animals much, some of which are surely in the same league of intelligence as dogs (ie animals killed for food and sport etc), surely getting all emotionally oldryan at that video above is a little doublestandardish? at least is the disproportionate response people have to some animals being killed/mistreated versus others apparent?
and we dont know the history of that dog. isnt it generally accepted that if they attack a human or something they get put down? maybe that dog was a complete shit. deciding he wasnt based on that video is a bit like watching a video of sadam being walked out and executed and thinking "why the hell are they doing that? he seems perferctly agreeable"[/quote]
You're really displaying your own idiocy here, Gleeso. First, you generalize people's value toward non-human animals, something that varies greatly between groups of people. Personally, I see a sharp difference between hunting (for food -- sport hunting, like catch-and-release fishing, is a liquid shit) and this killing. There is no double standard in reactions between the two. The other big piece to the point is the method. If the animal has crossed the location's bite/attack threshold for execution of said animal, the proper way to do this is through tranquilized euthanasia by a qualified DVM; even then, the determination, when no immediate threat is at hand like in the above video, is not to be made by the officer. The dog was docile and laying down, a position of submission, before the snare was brought out. Even after, when the dog reacted to the snare, the other officer successfully snared the dog. Controlled in this fashion, the animal was no direct threat to anyone. The snare is designed specifically for that purpose.
I was exaggerating when I said the officers should be shot, however. In reality, the one who discharged his firearm should be fined and put on unpaid administrative leave with mandatory animal-handling training or something to the equivalent. I'm not so certain the one who snared the dog was in any wrong.
and we dont know the history of that dog. isnt it generally accepted that if they attack a human or something they get put down? maybe that dog was a complete shit. deciding he wasnt based on that video is a bit like watching a video of sadam being walked out and executed and thinking "why the hell are they doing that? he seems perferctly agreeable"[/quote]
You're really displaying your own idiocy here, Gleeso. First, you generalize people's value toward non-human animals, something that varies greatly between groups of people. Personally, I see a sharp difference between hunting (for food -- sport hunting, like catch-and-release fishing, is a liquid shit) and this killing. There is no double standard in reactions between the two. The other big piece to the point is the method. If the animal has crossed the location's bite/attack threshold for execution of said animal, the proper way to do this is through tranquilized euthanasia by a qualified DVM; even then, the determination, when no immediate threat is at hand like in the above video, is not to be made by the officer. The dog was docile and laying down, a position of submission, before the snare was brought out. Even after, when the dog reacted to the snare, the other officer successfully snared the dog. Controlled in this fashion, the animal was no direct threat to anyone. The snare is designed specifically for that purpose.
I was exaggerating when I said the officers should be shot, however. In reality, the one who discharged his firearm should be fined and put on unpaid administrative leave with mandatory animal-handling training or something to the equivalent. I'm not so certain the one who snared the dog was in any wrong.
;,,;ANGEL OF DESEASE wrote:the path of whoring is something wicked and grim, and very philosophical.
- captain twat. IV.
- Ancient One
- Posts: 1352
- Joined: 29 Sep 2009, 14:13
- Location: New York
Re: Vicious dog lays down in front of vice squad, who then shoot it.
Fucking cowards.
- TamPron
- Metal God
- Posts: 16582
- Joined: 24 Apr 2009, 00:50
- Location: Rod Stewart
- Contact:
Re: Vicious dog lays down in front of vice squad, who then shoot it.
It wags it's tail after it gets shot.
[quote name="Extreme Noise Tara"]They are. [/quote]
- Abzu
- Postwhore
- Posts: 45528
- Joined: 17 Apr 2009, 08:35
- Location: next door
Re: Vicious dog lays down in front of vice squad, who then shoot it.
;,,;ANGEL OF DESEASE wrote:the path of whoring is something wicked and grim, and very philosophical.
- Shredlord
- Ancient One
- Posts: 1730
- Joined: 16 Apr 2009, 20:07
Re: Vicious dog lays down in front of vice squad, who then shoot it.
I usually try to support vice squad, but this is so fucking wrong. That tail wag after it gets shot is so sad.
I am the Dragon. And you call me insane. You are privy to a great becoming, but you recognize nothing. To me, you are a slug in the sun. You are an ant in the afterbirth. It is your nature to do one thing correctly: Before me, you rightly tremble. But, fear is not what you owe me. You owe me awe.
- shadowalk
- Metal God
- Posts: 13455
- Joined: 13 Apr 2009, 09:16
- Location: Manila, Philippines
- Haunty
- Metal God
- Posts: 12225
- Joined: 16 Apr 2009, 01:28
- Location: using Thibault to cancel out Capo Ferro
Re: Vicious dog lays down in front of vice squad, who then shoot it.
[quote name="TAM TAM"]It wags it's tail after it gets shot. [/quote]
Need a new signature? Why not Zoidberg? (V) (;,,;) (V)
- Abzu
- Postwhore
- Posts: 45528
- Joined: 17 Apr 2009, 08:35
- Location: next door
Re: Vicious dog lays down in front of vice squad, who then shoot it.
[quote name="hbw"]
[quote name="TAM TAM"]It wags it's tail after it gets shot. [/quote]
[/quote]
[quote name="TAM TAM"]It wags it's tail after it gets shot. [/quote]
[/quote]
;,,;ANGEL OF DESEASE wrote:the path of whoring is something wicked and grim, and very philosophical.
- Verbal
- The Melancholy Wizards
- Posts: 25051
- Joined: 18 Apr 2009, 03:05
Re: Vicious dog lays down in front of vice squad, who then shoot it.
[quote name="desolation"]
[quote name="Verbal"]given the fact people dont seem to value the lives other animals much, some of which are surely in the same league of intelligence as dogs (ie animals killed for food and sport etc), surely getting all emotionally oldryan at that video above is a little doublestandardish? at least is the disproportionate response people have to some animals being killed/mistreated versus others apparent?
and we dont know the history of that dog. isnt it generally accepted that if they attack a human or something they get put down? maybe that dog was a complete shit. deciding he wasnt based on that video is a bit like watching a video of sadam being walked out and executed and thinking "why the hell are they doing that? he seems perferctly agreeable"[/quote]
You're really displaying your own idiocy here, Gleeso. First, you generalize people's value toward non-human animals, something that varies greatly between groups of people. Personally, I see a sharp difference between hunting (for food -- sport hunting, like catch-and-release fishing, is a liquid shit) and this killing. There is no double standard in reactions between the two. The other big piece to the point is the method. If the animal has crossed the location's bite/attack threshold for execution of said animal, the proper way to do this is through tranquilized euthanasia by a qualified DVM; even then, the determination, when no immediate threat is at hand like in the above video, is not to be made by the officer. The dog was docile and laying down, a position of submission, before the snare was brought out. Even after, when the dog reacted to the snare, the other officer successfully snared the dog. Controlled in this fashion, the animal was no direct threat to anyone. The snare is designed specifically for that purpose.
I was exaggerating when I said the officers should be shot, however. In reality, the one who discharged his firearm should be fined and put on unpaid administrative leave with mandatory animal-handling training or something to the equivalent. I'm not so certain the one who snared the dog was in any wrong.[/quote]
i was going to sard this, but meh. i will concede i am an idiot, but i can't see what was so stupid about what i said in that post. (maybe because of the aforementioned idiocy.) "people dont seem to value the lives other animals much, some of which are surely in the same league of intelligence as dogs". obviously i dont mean all people without exception. and obviously different people care different amounts about different things. i dont see what was so outrageous about that.
[quote name="Verbal"]given the fact people dont seem to value the lives other animals much, some of which are surely in the same league of intelligence as dogs (ie animals killed for food and sport etc), surely getting all emotionally oldryan at that video above is a little doublestandardish? at least is the disproportionate response people have to some animals being killed/mistreated versus others apparent?
and we dont know the history of that dog. isnt it generally accepted that if they attack a human or something they get put down? maybe that dog was a complete shit. deciding he wasnt based on that video is a bit like watching a video of sadam being walked out and executed and thinking "why the hell are they doing that? he seems perferctly agreeable"[/quote]
You're really displaying your own idiocy here, Gleeso. First, you generalize people's value toward non-human animals, something that varies greatly between groups of people. Personally, I see a sharp difference between hunting (for food -- sport hunting, like catch-and-release fishing, is a liquid shit) and this killing. There is no double standard in reactions between the two. The other big piece to the point is the method. If the animal has crossed the location's bite/attack threshold for execution of said animal, the proper way to do this is through tranquilized euthanasia by a qualified DVM; even then, the determination, when no immediate threat is at hand like in the above video, is not to be made by the officer. The dog was docile and laying down, a position of submission, before the snare was brought out. Even after, when the dog reacted to the snare, the other officer successfully snared the dog. Controlled in this fashion, the animal was no direct threat to anyone. The snare is designed specifically for that purpose.
I was exaggerating when I said the officers should be shot, however. In reality, the one who discharged his firearm should be fined and put on unpaid administrative leave with mandatory animal-handling training or something to the equivalent. I'm not so certain the one who snared the dog was in any wrong.[/quote]
i was going to sard this, but meh. i will concede i am an idiot, but i can't see what was so stupid about what i said in that post. (maybe because of the aforementioned idiocy.) "people dont seem to value the lives other animals much, some of which are surely in the same league of intelligence as dogs". obviously i dont mean all people without exception. and obviously different people care different amounts about different things. i dont see what was so outrageous about that.
- Abzu
- Postwhore
- Posts: 45528
- Joined: 17 Apr 2009, 08:35
- Location: next door
Re: Vicious dog lays down in front of vice squad, who then shoot it.
[quote name="Verbal"]
[quote name="desolation"]
[quote name="Verbal"]given the fact people dont seem to value the lives other animals much, some of which are surely in the same league of intelligence as dogs (ie animals killed for food and sport etc), surely getting all emotionally oldryan at that video above is a little doublestandardish? at least is the disproportionate response people have to some animals being killed/mistreated versus others apparent?
and we dont know the history of that dog. isnt it generally accepted that if they attack a human or something they get put down? maybe that dog was a complete shit. deciding he wasnt based on that video is a bit like watching a video of sadam being walked out and executed and thinking "why the hell are they doing that? he seems perferctly agreeable"[/quote]
You're really displaying your own idiocy here, Gleeso. First, you generalize people's value toward non-human animals, something that varies greatly between groups of people. Personally, I see a sharp difference between hunting (for food -- sport hunting, like catch-and-release fishing, is a liquid shit) and this killing. There is no double standard in reactions between the two. The other big piece to the point is the method. If the animal has crossed the location's bite/attack threshold for execution of said animal, the proper way to do this is through tranquilized euthanasia by a qualified DVM; even then, the determination, when no immediate threat is at hand like in the above video, is not to be made by the officer. The dog was docile and laying down, a position of submission, before the snare was brought out. Even after, when the dog reacted to the snare, the other officer successfully snared the dog. Controlled in this fashion, the animal was no direct threat to anyone. The snare is designed specifically for that purpose.
I was exaggerating when I said the officers should be shot, however. In reality, the one who discharged his firearm should be fined and put on unpaid administrative leave with mandatory animal-handling training or something to the equivalent. I'm not so certain the one who snared the dog was in any wrong.[/quote]
i was going to sard this, but meh. i will concede i am an idiot, but i can't see what was so stupid about what i said in that post. (maybe because of the aforementioned idiocy.) "people dont seem to value the lives other animals much, some of which are surely in the same league of intelligence as dogs". obviously i dont mean all people without exception. and obviously different people care different amounts about different things. i dont see what was so outrageous about that.[/quote]
It was a generalization of something that is quite varied.
[quote name="desolation"]
[quote name="Verbal"]given the fact people dont seem to value the lives other animals much, some of which are surely in the same league of intelligence as dogs (ie animals killed for food and sport etc), surely getting all emotionally oldryan at that video above is a little doublestandardish? at least is the disproportionate response people have to some animals being killed/mistreated versus others apparent?
and we dont know the history of that dog. isnt it generally accepted that if they attack a human or something they get put down? maybe that dog was a complete shit. deciding he wasnt based on that video is a bit like watching a video of sadam being walked out and executed and thinking "why the hell are they doing that? he seems perferctly agreeable"[/quote]
You're really displaying your own idiocy here, Gleeso. First, you generalize people's value toward non-human animals, something that varies greatly between groups of people. Personally, I see a sharp difference between hunting (for food -- sport hunting, like catch-and-release fishing, is a liquid shit) and this killing. There is no double standard in reactions between the two. The other big piece to the point is the method. If the animal has crossed the location's bite/attack threshold for execution of said animal, the proper way to do this is through tranquilized euthanasia by a qualified DVM; even then, the determination, when no immediate threat is at hand like in the above video, is not to be made by the officer. The dog was docile and laying down, a position of submission, before the snare was brought out. Even after, when the dog reacted to the snare, the other officer successfully snared the dog. Controlled in this fashion, the animal was no direct threat to anyone. The snare is designed specifically for that purpose.
I was exaggerating when I said the officers should be shot, however. In reality, the one who discharged his firearm should be fined and put on unpaid administrative leave with mandatory animal-handling training or something to the equivalent. I'm not so certain the one who snared the dog was in any wrong.[/quote]
i was going to sard this, but meh. i will concede i am an idiot, but i can't see what was so stupid about what i said in that post. (maybe because of the aforementioned idiocy.) "people dont seem to value the lives other animals much, some of which are surely in the same league of intelligence as dogs". obviously i dont mean all people without exception. and obviously different people care different amounts about different things. i dont see what was so outrageous about that.[/quote]
It was a generalization of something that is quite varied.
;,,;ANGEL OF DESEASE wrote:the path of whoring is something wicked and grim, and very philosophical.
- Verbal
- The Melancholy Wizards
- Posts: 25051
- Joined: 18 Apr 2009, 03:05
Re: Vicious dog lays down in front of vice squad, who then shoot it.
[quote name="desolation"]
[quote name="Verbal"]
[quote name="desolation"]
[quote name="Verbal"]given the fact people dont seem to value the lives other animals much, some of which are surely in the same league of intelligence as dogs (ie animals killed for food and sport etc), surely getting all emotionally oldryan at that video above is a little doublestandardish? at least is the disproportionate response people have to some animals being killed/mistreated versus others apparent?
and we dont know the history of that dog. isnt it generally accepted that if they attack a human or something they get put down? maybe that dog was a complete shit. deciding he wasnt based on that video is a bit like watching a video of sadam being walked out and executed and thinking "why the hell are they doing that? he seems perferctly agreeable"[/quote]
You're really displaying your own idiocy here, Gleeso. First, you generalize people's value toward non-human animals, something that varies greatly between groups of people. Personally, I see a sharp difference between hunting (for food -- sport hunting, like catch-and-release fishing, is a liquid shit) and this killing. There is no double standard in reactions between the two. The other big piece to the point is the method. If the animal has crossed the location's bite/attack threshold for execution of said animal, the proper way to do this is through tranquilized euthanasia by a qualified DVM; even then, the determination, when no immediate threat is at hand like in the above video, is not to be made by the officer. The dog was docile and laying down, a position of submission, before the snare was brought out. Even after, when the dog reacted to the snare, the other officer successfully snared the dog. Controlled in this fashion, the animal was no direct threat to anyone. The snare is designed specifically for that purpose.
I was exaggerating when I said the officers should be shot, however. In reality, the one who discharged his firearm should be fined and put on unpaid administrative leave with mandatory animal-handling training or something to the equivalent. I'm not so certain the one who snared the dog was in any wrong.[/quote]
i was going to sard this, but meh. i will concede i am an idiot, but i can't see what was so stupid about what i said in that post. (maybe because of the aforementioned idiocy.) "people dont seem to value the lives other animals much, some of which are surely in the same league of intelligence as dogs". obviously i dont mean all people without exception. and obviously different people care different amounts about different things. i dont see what was so outrageous about that.[/quote]
It was a generalization of something that is quite varied.[/quote]
you really thought i meant all people without exception feel the exact same way about this?
[quote name="Verbal"]
[quote name="desolation"]
[quote name="Verbal"]given the fact people dont seem to value the lives other animals much, some of which are surely in the same league of intelligence as dogs (ie animals killed for food and sport etc), surely getting all emotionally oldryan at that video above is a little doublestandardish? at least is the disproportionate response people have to some animals being killed/mistreated versus others apparent?
and we dont know the history of that dog. isnt it generally accepted that if they attack a human or something they get put down? maybe that dog was a complete shit. deciding he wasnt based on that video is a bit like watching a video of sadam being walked out and executed and thinking "why the hell are they doing that? he seems perferctly agreeable"[/quote]
You're really displaying your own idiocy here, Gleeso. First, you generalize people's value toward non-human animals, something that varies greatly between groups of people. Personally, I see a sharp difference between hunting (for food -- sport hunting, like catch-and-release fishing, is a liquid shit) and this killing. There is no double standard in reactions between the two. The other big piece to the point is the method. If the animal has crossed the location's bite/attack threshold for execution of said animal, the proper way to do this is through tranquilized euthanasia by a qualified DVM; even then, the determination, when no immediate threat is at hand like in the above video, is not to be made by the officer. The dog was docile and laying down, a position of submission, before the snare was brought out. Even after, when the dog reacted to the snare, the other officer successfully snared the dog. Controlled in this fashion, the animal was no direct threat to anyone. The snare is designed specifically for that purpose.
I was exaggerating when I said the officers should be shot, however. In reality, the one who discharged his firearm should be fined and put on unpaid administrative leave with mandatory animal-handling training or something to the equivalent. I'm not so certain the one who snared the dog was in any wrong.[/quote]
i was going to sard this, but meh. i will concede i am an idiot, but i can't see what was so stupid about what i said in that post. (maybe because of the aforementioned idiocy.) "people dont seem to value the lives other animals much, some of which are surely in the same league of intelligence as dogs". obviously i dont mean all people without exception. and obviously different people care different amounts about different things. i dont see what was so outrageous about that.[/quote]
It was a generalization of something that is quite varied.[/quote]
you really thought i meant all people without exception feel the exact same way about this?
- Abzu
- Postwhore
- Posts: 45528
- Joined: 17 Apr 2009, 08:35
- Location: next door
Re: Vicious dog lays down in front of vice squad, who then shoot it.
No no no, you misunderstand. It was that you attempted to extrapolate a general consensus in such a scattered subject.
;,,;ANGEL OF DESEASE wrote:the path of whoring is something wicked and grim, and very philosophical.
- Verbal
- The Melancholy Wizards
- Posts: 25051
- Joined: 18 Apr 2009, 03:05
Re: Vicious dog lays down in front of vice squad, who then shoot it.
i think you may have read too much into what i said