What do you all think about still using shit like 4 track recorders
- Paste Human
- Metal God
- Posts: 6176
- Joined: 30 Jan 2012, 07:29
- Location: The American Sector
What do you all think about still using shit like 4 track recorders
I had completely forgotten about these, and they never meant much since i was never a musician. But for a brief period I was part of a joke band that recorded shit on a 4 track Tascam, along with an answering machine at one point. We also made shirts and a documentary for lack of anything better to do. Those were my high school years.
So are these devices just out of favor now? Do professional bands still sometimes insist on doing reel to reel live takes? I haven't kept up with this, but there is definitely a noticeable difference here and there. Sometimes it was probably better that they did things the old fashioned way, and sometimes not. At least the way I see it. Although I will say that overproduction (especially making it all spick and span sounding) has been pretty bad for metal on a widespread level for at least 20 years now.
So are these devices just out of favor now? Do professional bands still sometimes insist on doing reel to reel live takes? I haven't kept up with this, but there is definitely a noticeable difference here and there. Sometimes it was probably better that they did things the old fashioned way, and sometimes not. At least the way I see it. Although I will say that overproduction (especially making it all spick and span sounding) has been pretty bad for metal on a widespread level for at least 20 years now.
- vO)))id
- Metal God
- Posts: 12201
- Joined: 13 Apr 2009, 14:44
Re: What do you all think about still using shit like 4 track recorders
I think they're awesome. The limitations they lay upon you force you to be creative and make decisions.
One of the greatest pitfalls of modern DAW's are the endless possibilities of editing, undoing, etc. There is no undo with pure analog. Only redo. And that definitely has a positive side to it.
One of the greatest pitfalls of modern DAW's are the endless possibilities of editing, undoing, etc. There is no undo with pure analog. Only redo. And that definitely has a positive side to it.
- vO)))id
- Metal God
- Posts: 12201
- Joined: 13 Apr 2009, 14:44
Re: What do you all think about still using shit like 4 track recorders
By the way, many bands still work that way. Check out engineers Vance Powell and Steve Albini.
Albini is still 100% analog tape based, Vance does both and hybrid.
Albini is still 100% analog tape based, Vance does both and hybrid.
- Paste Human
- Metal God
- Posts: 6176
- Joined: 30 Jan 2012, 07:29
- Location: The American Sector
Re: What do you all think about still using shit like 4 track recorders
I definitely will.
This was prompted by reading Kelly from Atheist mentioning how electric their first two (and then maybe third?) albums sounded because it was all live analogue takes.
And then it's hard not to slap yourself on the forehead (at least for me) and realize what was missing from a lot of otherwise well written albums that came out later on. And then of course remembering how fun it was to record onto such a limited resource and budget our ideas that way, but try to make it true to form but also memorable on one take because of that. I don't know much of anything about modern production, but in a lot of cases it strikes me as playing tennis without a net. Not very exciting.
This was prompted by reading Kelly from Atheist mentioning how electric their first two (and then maybe third?) albums sounded because it was all live analogue takes.
And then it's hard not to slap yourself on the forehead (at least for me) and realize what was missing from a lot of otherwise well written albums that came out later on. And then of course remembering how fun it was to record onto such a limited resource and budget our ideas that way, but try to make it true to form but also memorable on one take because of that. I don't know much of anything about modern production, but in a lot of cases it strikes me as playing tennis without a net. Not very exciting.
- vO)))id
- Metal God
- Posts: 12201
- Joined: 13 Apr 2009, 14:44
Re: What do you all think about still using shit like 4 track recorders
Modern production is awesome as well. It all depends on your workflow, the music, how one would get inspired.... they're all tools to create music. Some stuff isn't possible in the purely digital world and some stuff isn't possible in the purely analog world.
There is no better way. They're just different.
But when digital just came into fashion, a lot of records suffered because the engineers working on them were also new to that domain.
There is no better way. They're just different.
But when digital just came into fashion, a lot of records suffered because the engineers working on them were also new to that domain.
- Paste Human
- Metal God
- Posts: 6176
- Joined: 30 Jan 2012, 07:29
- Location: The American Sector
Re: What do you all think about still using shit like 4 track recorders
Yeah you're probably right.
I'm trying to remember the more recent albums I've heard where an initial thought was "this would have sounded so much better if it was recorded in Florida 25 years ago" but none come to mind. The number one letdown I can think of is Slayer's first two full lengths because Dave Lombardo was always so big for me, but to be honest I can't even really imagine the Reign in Blood drum sound on those albums. Everything would have to be updated, and I'm not sure I could get on board with that.
I'm trying to remember the more recent albums I've heard where an initial thought was "this would have sounded so much better if it was recorded in Florida 25 years ago" but none come to mind. The number one letdown I can think of is Slayer's first two full lengths because Dave Lombardo was always so big for me, but to be honest I can't even really imagine the Reign in Blood drum sound on those albums. Everything would have to be updated, and I'm not sure I could get on board with that.
- vO)))id
- Metal God
- Posts: 12201
- Joined: 13 Apr 2009, 14:44
Re: What do you all think about still using shit like 4 track recorders
Albums are pieces of recorded history. They should be respected and viewed as such. That's why I hate re-mixed and re-mastered albums most of the time. It doesn't do the music and the timeframe that it was made in any justice.
The little mistakes or blemishes on those old records are what make them unique and part of that time in music history.
The little mistakes or blemishes on those old records are what make them unique and part of that time in music history.
- Paste Human
- Metal God
- Posts: 6176
- Joined: 30 Jan 2012, 07:29
- Location: The American Sector
Re: What do you all think about still using shit like 4 track recorders
Very well put. But don't you have a few albums that you'll listen to and love how it was written but then think "if only they had just recorded it this way..."? I have a few, and maybe my vision would sound terrible, but there are definitely some individual performances from a while back that got shit all over that maybe were not so bad after all.
The early stuff from Slayer, Exodus, Possessed, etc. bugs me for being so tinny. But I could just as easily see a rebooted version of that material sounding "too live" or fake.
The early stuff from Slayer, Exodus, Possessed, etc. bugs me for being so tinny. But I could just as easily see a rebooted version of that material sounding "too live" or fake.
- vO)))id
- Metal God
- Posts: 12201
- Joined: 13 Apr 2009, 14:44
Re: What do you all think about still using shit like 4 track recorders
No records come to mind right now...
I only have that feeling with stuff that comes out nowadays. And even then it's still rare that I feel that way.
I only have that feeling with stuff that comes out nowadays. And even then it's still rare that I feel that way.
- happiness and harmony
- Postwhore
- Posts: 77222
- Joined: 18 Apr 2009, 07:36
- jawn galliano
- Yahtzee Genius
- Posts: 23266
- Joined: 17 Apr 2009, 04:24
Re: What do you all think about still using shit like 4 track recorders
agree bigtime. to expand on the 'most of the time' qualifier though, i think there's some leeway for vinyl/analog-era stuff getting remix/remaster treatments to make up for poor digital transfers in the early days of the CD era. insofar as they attempt to more closely-capture the original, anyway; there are obviously loads of those that were updates for loudness wars standards that wound up being worse than all of their forebears & mostly existed just to milk diehard fans rather than address any concerns about accuracy or fidelity.iamgoat wrote:Albums are pieces of recorded history. They should be respected and viewed as such. That's why I hate re-mixed and re-mastered albums most of the time. It doesn't do the music and the timeframe that it was made in any justice.
The little mistakes or blemishes on those old records are what make them unique and part of that time in music history.
- zim
- Zim(a)
- Posts: 26250
- Joined: 14 Apr 2009, 02:36
- Location: couch
Re: What do you all think about still using shit like 4 track recorders
speaking of remixes, cynic remastered/remixed traced in air and removed all the screaming vocals. that really pissed me off
- Paste Human
- Metal God
- Posts: 6176
- Joined: 30 Jan 2012, 07:29
- Location: The American Sector
Re: What do you all think about still using shit like 4 track recorders
I might be one of the only people who prefers the original first four Megadeth mixes (everything beyond that didn't even need any work) but it was cool to hear all the instrumentation with clarity at least once. Especially on the debut, because Gar was a really great drummer.
A similar example is Death's "Human" which is still a personal favorite. It was awesome finally getting to hear exactly what Steve brought to the table on that album, but I still always go for the original mix. I'm sure there's the sentimental part of it all, but some of the earlier metal releases required such careful listening to pick up on all the nuances that I think it gets to be hard to hear the studio version of those songs any other way.
A similar example is Death's "Human" which is still a personal favorite. It was awesome finally getting to hear exactly what Steve brought to the table on that album, but I still always go for the original mix. I'm sure there's the sentimental part of it all, but some of the earlier metal releases required such careful listening to pick up on all the nuances that I think it gets to be hard to hear the studio version of those songs any other way.
- diabolik
- Member
- Posts: 221
- Joined: 09 May 2016, 20:22
- Location: Finlandia
Re: What do you all think about still using shit like 4 track recorders
I have a 4 track tape recorder. It's awesome for high volume noise, can lean into the limiter and it doesn't go all digitized mash.