So the shroud of Turin is bullshit.
Posted: 21 Jul 2010, 05:05
[youtube]pq5j_lGtlf8[/youtube]
MABB v6.6.6
Fucking 23 Years of Pool Parties Fucking
https://mabb.us/
So the shroud of Turin is bullshit.
Page 1 of 1
Re: So the shroud of Turin is bullshit.
Posted: 21 Jul 2010, 05:16
my faith shall remain steadfast nonetheless. this actually makes me even more certain that it is true.
Re: So the shroud of Turin is bullshit.
Posted: 21 Jul 2010, 05:21
People will complain, "You took the wrong piece, but you can't take any more because this is a holy artifact!"
I want to go off on a tangent. Last night on the Rachel Maddow Show she talked about cesium-137 dating to determine authenticity of vintage bottles of wine as a starting point to talk about the significance of South Africa preventing the sale of cesium-137 to militants. Anyone else think it is totally cool that it took man harnessing atomic power to populate the earth with said material?
I want to go off on a tangent. Last night on the Rachel Maddow Show she talked about cesium-137 dating to determine authenticity of vintage bottles of wine as a starting point to talk about the significance of South Africa preventing the sale of cesium-137 to militants. Anyone else think it is totally cool that it took man harnessing atomic power to populate the earth with said material?
Re: So the shroud of Turin is bullshit.
Posted: 21 Jul 2010, 06:42
Ancient Astronauts 
Re: So the shroud of Turin is bullshit.
Posted: 21 Jul 2010, 09:17
[quote name="The Fu Monster"]People will complain, "You took the wrong piece, but you can't take any more because this is a holy artifact!"
I want to go off on a tangent. Last night on the Rachel Maddow Show she talked about cesium-137 dating to determine authenticity of vintage bottles of wine as a starting point to talk about the significance of South Africa preventing the sale of cesium-137 to militants. Anyone else think it is totally cool that it took man harnessing atomic power to populate the earth with said material?[/quote]
Yes, it is in fact
I want to go off on a tangent. Last night on the Rachel Maddow Show she talked about cesium-137 dating to determine authenticity of vintage bottles of wine as a starting point to talk about the significance of South Africa preventing the sale of cesium-137 to militants. Anyone else think it is totally cool that it took man harnessing atomic power to populate the earth with said material?[/quote]
Yes, it is in fact
Re: So the shroud of Turin is bullshit.
Posted: 21 Jul 2010, 10:41
Wow, who would've guessed that an artifact of a man who never existed would be fake.
Re: So the shroud of Turin is bullshit.
Posted: 21 Jul 2010, 12:53
[quote name="Subcomandante Marcos"]Wow, who would've guessed that an artifact of a man who never existed would be fake.[/quote]
Well, at least making the claim about the artifact is no longer just an assertion, its a god damn FACT.
FACTFACTFACT
PROOFPROOFPROOF...
WHERE IS YOUR GOD NOW?
etc.
Well, at least making the claim about the artifact is no longer just an assertion, its a god damn FACT.
FACTFACTFACT
PROOFPROOFPROOF...
WHERE IS YOUR GOD NOW?
etc.
Re: So the shroud of Turin is bullshit.
Posted: 21 Jul 2010, 21:59
[quote name="Subcomandante Marcos"]Wow, who would've guessed that an artifact of a man who never existed would be fake.[/quote]
Fuck you-
'Everybody needs something to believe in.'
Fuck you-
'Everybody needs something to believe in.'
Re: So the shroud of Turin is bullshit.
Posted: 22 Jul 2010, 00:17
[quote name="Subcomandante Marcos"]Wow, who would've guessed that an artifact of a man who never existed would be fake.[/quote]
I'm pretty sure the dude actually existed
Wether he was what christianity makes him out is another thing eintirely
I'm pretty sure the dude actually existed
Wether he was what christianity makes him out is another thing eintirely
Re: So the shroud of Turin is bullshit.
Posted: 22 Jul 2010, 00:59
[quote name="TAM TAM"]
[quote name="Subcomandante Marcos"]Wow, who would've guessed that an artifact of a man who never existed would be fake.[/quote]
I'm pretty sure the dude actually existed [/quote]
That's wonderful.
Too bad there's no more genuine historical evidence for him than there is for Plato though.
[quote name="Subcomandante Marcos"]Wow, who would've guessed that an artifact of a man who never existed would be fake.[/quote]
I'm pretty sure the dude actually existed
[/quote]That's wonderful.
Too bad there's no more genuine historical evidence for him than there is for Plato though.