Re: the walking dead
Posted: 15 Oct 2010, 06:50
the series begins on halloween, cant wait
Page 1 of 1
Re: the walking dead
Posted: 15 Oct 2010, 11:30
Frank Darabont is directing this? Sold.
Re: the walking dead
Posted: 15 Oct 2010, 16:30
I need this show so baaaaaaad!!
in the meantime I recommend you zombieheads read JL Bourne's Day By Day Armageddon (there's 2 books) it's fucking brilliant
in the meantime I recommend you zombieheads read JL Bourne's Day By Day Armageddon (there's 2 books) it's fucking brilliant
Re: the walking dead
Posted: 16 Oct 2010, 02:22
The comic 
There's a 17 minute behind the scenes posted on ToplessRobot, but I severely sard looking for it.
There's a 17 minute behind the scenes posted on ToplessRobot, but I severely sard looking for it.
Re: the walking dead
Posted: 16 Oct 2010, 05:22
Holy fuck.
Re: the walking dead
Posted: 16 Oct 2010, 19:23
eh zombies again.. but looks interesting
Re: the walking dead
Posted: 17 Oct 2010, 00:14
[quote name="Zajebiste!"]Holy fuck.[/quote]
Re: the walking dead
Posted: 17 Oct 2010, 01:11
[quote name="Skintoxication"]at least hollywood cant ruin zombies with some retarded love story like they did vampires[/quote]
i'm sure it'll happen one day
i'm sure it'll happen one day
Re: the walking dead
Posted: 24 Oct 2010, 01:00
don't dead open inside?
what the hell does that mean?
damn cryptic zombie bastards.
what the hell does that mean?
damn cryptic zombie bastards.
Re: the walking dead
Posted: 24 Oct 2010, 04:32
Zombie movies are the worst
Re: the walking dead
Posted: 24 Oct 2010, 06:15
:failpost:
Re: the walking dead
Posted: 24 Oct 2010, 12:35
[quote name="Skintoxication"]at least hollywood cant ruin zombies with some retarded love story like they did vampires[/quote]
sadly, it will happen.
<!-- m -->http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breathers: ... e's_Lament<!-- m -->
<!-- m -->http://hollywoodcrush.mtv.com/2010/09/0 ... es-lament/<!-- m -->
sadly, it will happen.
<!-- m -->http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breathers: ... e's_Lament<!-- m -->
<!-- m -->http://hollywoodcrush.mtv.com/2010/09/0 ... es-lament/<!-- m -->
Re: the walking dead
Posted: 24 Oct 2010, 22:34
one more week!
Re: the walking dead
Posted: 25 Oct 2010, 01:39
two more for us sorry ass Brits..however I have remedied this by watching the first episode already mauwhhahahaha!! FUCK YOU FOX!
Re: the walking dead
Posted: 25 Oct 2010, 03:56
[quote name="Skintoxication"]im pretty sure its supposed to be "dont open dead inside"[/quote]
nooooooo.........
how on earth did you decode that?
you, sir, are some kind of sorcerer.
nooooooo.........
how on earth did you decode that?
you, sir, are some kind of sorcerer.
Re: the walking dead
Posted: 25 Oct 2010, 07:12
it must have been good, or else he wouldn't boast.
Re: the walking dead
Posted: 25 Oct 2010, 17:48
[quote name="carpet_salesman"]
[quote name="Skintoxication"]at least hollywood cant ruin zombies with some retarded love story like they did vampires[/quote]
sadly, it will happen.
<!-- m -->http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breathers: ... e's_Lament<!-- m -->
<!-- m -->http://hollywoodcrush.mtv.com/2010/09/0 ... es-lament/<!-- m -->
[/quote]
Oh come on, that sounds like it could actually be funny. It'd only be gay if it were supposed to be serious.
[quote name="Skintoxication"]at least hollywood cant ruin zombies with some retarded love story like they did vampires[/quote]
sadly, it will happen.
<!-- m -->http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breathers: ... e's_Lament<!-- m -->
<!-- m -->http://hollywoodcrush.mtv.com/2010/09/0 ... es-lament/<!-- m -->
[/quote]Oh come on, that sounds like it could actually be funny. It'd only be gay if it were supposed to be serious.
Re: the walking dead
Posted: 27 Oct 2010, 01:58
zombie movies are kind of ruined anyways with all these running zombies
<!-- m -->http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2008/no ... g-dead-set<!-- m -->
dont get me wrong, I like most of these films but to me zombies that run are kind of like vampires that sparkle.
<!-- m -->http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2008/no ... g-dead-set<!-- m -->
dont get me wrong, I like most of these films but to me zombies that run are kind of like vampires that sparkle.
Re: the walking dead
Posted: 27 Oct 2010, 02:01
[quote name="´cross the breeze"]zombie movies are kind of ruined anyways with all these running zombies
<!-- m -->http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2008/no ... g-dead-set<!-- m -->
dont get me wrong, I like most of these films but to me zombies that run are kind of like vampires that sparkle.[/quote]
^ truth
the only exception for running zombies is in video games
<!-- m -->http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2008/no ... g-dead-set<!-- m -->
dont get me wrong, I like most of these films but to me zombies that run are kind of like vampires that sparkle.[/quote]
^ truth
the only exception for running zombies is in video games
Re: the walking dead
Posted: 27 Oct 2010, 04:13
if the "zombies that run" comment is directed at movies like 28 days later, etc...those aren't typical zombies. they're supposed to be cases of infected humans, not the dead rising and what not. they're certainly similar, but i can't say they're the same thing.
Re: the walking dead
Posted: 27 Oct 2010, 08:05
i agree with the skinny one.
Re: the walking dead
Posted: 27 Oct 2010, 10:40
[quote name="erica"]i agree with the skinny one.[/quote]
Re: the walking dead
Posted: 27 Oct 2010, 14:54
[quote name="Skintoxication"]
[quote name="´cross the breeze"]zombie movies are kind of ruined anyways with all these running zombies
<!-- m -->http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2008/no ... g-dead-set<!-- m -->
dont get me wrong, I like most of these films but to me zombies that run are kind of like vampires that sparkle.[/quote]
i respectfully disagree. there's really no set "rule" for how zombies are supposed to act. being undead, eating people and that you have to destroy their brains to "kill" them (sans return of the living dead) are really the only requirements. it also probably depends on what the director is going for. zombies that run make for more of an action/suspense setting, whereas zombies that shuffle create a more thriller/atmospheric setting.[/quote]
in which movie does the zombies have leader and start to learn to use guns? i remembering seeing somewhere.
[quote name="´cross the breeze"]zombie movies are kind of ruined anyways with all these running zombies
<!-- m -->http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2008/no ... g-dead-set<!-- m -->
dont get me wrong, I like most of these films but to me zombies that run are kind of like vampires that sparkle.[/quote]
i respectfully disagree. there's really no set "rule" for how zombies are supposed to act. being undead, eating people and that you have to destroy their brains to "kill" them (sans return of the living dead) are really the only requirements. it also probably depends on what the director is going for. zombies that run make for more of an action/suspense setting, whereas zombies that shuffle create a more thriller/atmospheric setting.[/quote]
in which movie does the zombies have leader and start to learn to use guns? i remembering seeing somewhere.
Re: the walking dead
Posted: 27 Oct 2010, 17:20
bub
Re: the walking dead
Posted: 28 Oct 2010, 01:23
has anyone seen survival of the dead?
Re: the walking dead
Posted: 28 Oct 2010, 04:32
yes
Don't bother, seriously.
Romero must have been on some serious crack when he made that pile of horseshit.
Don't bother, seriously.
Romero must have been on some serious crack when he made that pile of horseshit.
Re: the walking dead
Posted: 28 Oct 2010, 08:55
[quote name="baron von blondle"]yes
Don't bother, seriously.
Romero must have been on some serious crack when he made that pile of horseshit.[/quote]
yes, it was terrible.
the only cool part was when the top part of the guys head lands on his neck after getting his head blown off.
and it ties in with diary of the dead.
Don't bother, seriously.
Romero must have been on some serious crack when he made that pile of horseshit.[/quote]
yes, it was terrible.
the only cool part was when the top part of the guys head lands on his neck after getting his head blown off.
and it ties in with diary of the dead.