MABB v6.6.6

if it turns out to just be meh i'm going to be really disappointed. i hope it is as awful and vapid as all the reviews seem to think it is

thats no way to think

of course it is silly billy. this will not be the first time in music history that a band has laid a golden egg with poopy afterbirth inside of it. i am hoping for a few good laughs; nothing more. it seems pretty evident that MA is a fractured band these days

personally i am happy with what ive heard so far and think this is gonna be some crazy stuff...mea culpa sounds fucking extreme

you are the first person i have heard use that word positively when talking about this album

[quote name="Dusto"]all the reviews[/quote]

Which reviews, those written by amateurs?

So far the only review written by a professional guaranteed 8.5/10...

god of perverse what

[quote name="Dusto"]god of perverse what [/quote]

On craveonline.com

no i mean perverse is an adjective it doesnt make sense to call yourself "god of perverse." it's like saying "god of tiny" or "god of sterile"



"god of perversity" would make sense

[quote name="Dusto"]no i mean perverse is an adjective it doesnt make sense to call yourself "god of perverse." it's like saying "god of tiny" or "god of sterile"



"god of perversity" would make sense [/quote]

Hahahaha



Probably, but It's only a tribute to David Vincent, who signed (maybe even now) his songs as God of Perverse (for ASCAP).

well then david vincent is even less bright than i thought he might be

[quote name="100k ass-to-ass"]well then david vincent is even less bright than i thought he might be[/quote]

[quote name="themicrulah"]
[quote name="100k ass-to-ass"]well then david vincent is even less bright than i thought he might be[/quote][/quote]

:godofbright:

BOW BEFORE ME FOR I AM THE GOD OF EMPTY

No, I think he simply meant the absolute Perverse (as the difference between Malign and malignity).

GOD OF RETARDED

[quote name="God of Perverse"]
[quote name="Dusto"]all the reviews[/quote]

Which reviews, those written by amateurs?

[/quote]

yeah, because metalreviews.com is known to be amateur site

also, how could anyone in their right mind describe that craveonline review as 'pro'? tha fuck

every review posted in here and also a few you get when you google morbid angel

[quote name="Uros"]
[quote name="God of Perverse"]
[quote name="Dusto"]all the reviews[/quote]

Which reviews, those written by amateurs?

[/quote]

yeah, because metalreviews.com is known to be amateur site

also, how could anyone in their right mind describe that craveonline review as 'pro'? tha fuck[/quote]



Yet the have a Mortification album in their "classics" section. I'm not saying that they're amateurs. But tastes differ. Obviously.

[quote name="Uros"]
[quote name="God of Perverse"]
[quote name="Dusto"]all the reviews[/quote]

Which reviews, those written by amateurs?

[/quote]

yeah, because metalreviews.com is known to be amateur site

also, how could anyone in their right mind describe that craveonline review as 'pro'? tha fuck[/quote]

Do you think is a site of professional journalists?

Yes, Iann Robinson is a professional.

However, each opinion is absolutely legitimate, we are in a world (almost entirely) democratic.

I am curious to read Terrorizer, Decibel and other specialized magazines reviews.



I gotta go, hear you soon.

@WTSL:

I am only saying because their reputation. They really are not unknown. I agree that tastes differ. When so many people are in agreeance on something, the least one can do is to ask himself 'could this be right?'

So, that's why I like this method of reviewing, when you have a couple of reviewers instead of one, single review.

Do you think is a site of professional journalists?

Yes, Iann Robinson is a professional.

However, each opinion is absolutely legitimate, we are in a democracy.

I am curious to read Terrorizer, Decibel and other specialized magazines reviews.

Professional as...? Maybe he is, but he is totally biased. It's obvious that he is not familiar with death metal genre.

It's like having a pop/rock producer to mix an extreme metal album. It may result as a killer product, but most likely will sound horrible, because pop/rock producer are looking for different production values and will have very different sense of aesthetics. It's the same way here.

Yes, that was just a consideration. The fact that he's a professional music journalist can also mean nothing. See you soon.

Reputable music journalists always give honest reviews.

you guys are boring the shit out of this thread right now

No.

you go color in your walls some more

[quote name="God of Perverse"]Yes, that was just a consideration. The fact that he's a professional music journalist can also mean nothing. See you soon.[/quote]

If you go that route, you might as well stop listening metal, because majority of professional musicians around the globe see metal as lesser music.

As I said, he might be pro in a sense that he does reviews for a living, but in no way is he familiar with death metal, which this review clearly shows.

[quote name="100k ass-to-ass"]you go color in your walls some more[/quote]

its ok you can play your music while you do it

This thread is funnnnn

that craveonline review is without question the worst one posted so far. and it's nothing to do with the hard-on bearer's opinion, it's just a shitty review written by a shitty writer

im not reading any more reviews i want the god damn thing to leak already

actually i dont:



<!-- m -->http://www.invisibleoranges.com/2011/05 ... m-insanus/<!-- m -->



this is pretty much killing it for me

The only like:dislike ratio I’ve seen like this on YouTube is for Rebecca Black’s “Friday”.