what if Illud Divinum Insanus....

Those Insane Gods · Post by **Those Insane Gods** » 02 Jun 2011, 20:18

[quote name="Grimmigheid"]- Nobody here is a Steve Tucker fanboy, only people who might prefer his vocal performances above David's.[/quote]

Sometime you just can't see the forest for the trees.

vO)))id · Post by **vO)))id** » 02 Jun 2011, 20:19

Alright, some of us got out of line, including myself. Reasons are of course how passionate people are about Morbid Angel.

vO)))id · Post by **vO)))id** » 02 Jun 2011, 20:20

[quote name="Those Insane Gods"]
[quote name="Grimmigheid"]- Nobody here is a Steve Tucker fanboy, only people who might prefer his vocal performances above David's.[/quote]

Sometime you just can't see the forest for the trees.

[/quote]

Point out those Tucker fanboys then! Give me all their names and quoted lines that say so.

Those Insane Gods · Post by **Those Insane Gods** » 02 Jun 2011, 20:26

[quote name=";,,;"]That's a ridiculous way to make a point. Trey said shit about Vincent after Domination and talked up Tucker. For you to cherry pick only what you agree with from what he's said for your flamebait shit of a point is, well, fucking pointless.[/quote]

This was the first shithead comment in this debate. Read back and you'll see.

I THINK Tucker is/was a generic vocalist with close to no charisma brought in to make sure Trey would get his message across without any problems. See this is obviously a very unpopular opinion around this place. In fact it's impossible to have utter it without getting accused of being a cock-sucking Vincent fanboy. This thread and the quoted post above is a good example of that.

You all deserve this album and I'm not even saying that to be an asshole.

Those Insane Gods · Post by **Those Insane Gods** » 02 Jun 2011, 20:27

[quote name="Grimmigheid"]Alright, some of us got out of line, including myself. Reasons are of course how passionate people are about Morbid Angel.[/quote]

Yeah it's cool. As long as we can get along.

Abzu · Post by **Abzu** » 02 Jun 2011, 22:21

[quote name="Those Insane Gods"]
[quote name=";,,;"]That's a ridiculous way to make a point. Trey said shit about Vincent after Domination and talked up Tucker. For you to cherry pick only what you agree with from what he's said for your flamebait shit of a point is, well, fucking pointless.[/quote]

This was the first shithead comment in this debate. Read back and you'll see.

I THINK Tucker is/was a generic vocalist with close to no charisma brought in to make sure Trey would get his message across without any problems. See this is obviously a very unpopular opinion around this place. In fact it's impossible to have utter it without getting accused of being a cock-sucking Vincent fanboy. This thread and the quoted post above is a good example of that.

You all deserve this album and I'm not even saying that to be an asshole.

[/quote]

It was your line of reason behind your opinion -- the context of the citation; not the opinion itself. Re-read my post over and over until it sinks in. If you had said, "I THINK Tucker is/was a generic vocalist with close to no charisma brought in to make sure Trey would get his message across without any problems." in the first place, it would be a whole different story. There is no flawed reasoning there -- it is just an expression of an opinion. Do you see the difference? It is not very obscured.

Verbal · Post by **Verbal** » 02 Jun 2011, 22:32

[quote name=";,,;"]This has to be interesting from a psychological standpoint. He jumps at any criticism of Vincent with attacks at Tucker and the critics, then says Tucker isn't above criticism. There must be a disorder associated with this kind of jackassery.[/quote]

Disorders have been defined on less.

OMG he has "jumps at any criticism of Vincent with attacks at Tucker and the critics, then says Tucker isn't above criticism." syndrome. It's massively underrecognised and undertreated. What do you mean it's stupid? Look at this hard-on bearer here - he clearly has it! Since it was first described 10 seconds ago there has a remarkable increase in the bumber of cases - and this will probably increase as time goes on. As awareness of this afflictions becomes more widespread. Let's rebrand SSRIs and get a new patent as the new effective treatment for this awful condition. I suppose a multidisiplinary approach may work best. Lets ignore the fact that telling him he "has" this condition will make him do it more.

jawn galliano · Post by **jawn galliano** » 02 Jun 2011, 22:51

[quote name="Those Insane Gods"]In fact it's impossible to have utter it without getting accused of being a cock-sucking Vincent fanboy. This thread and the quoted post above is a good example of that.[/quote]

well in fairness when you do things like publicly laud david vincent's "masculine sexual charisma" it does make it sound like you are very literally sexually attracted to david vincent

[quote name="Verbal"]I suppose a multidisiplinary approach may work best.[/quote]

that's no mere supposition my fellating lover, it's an immutable law of nature. etched into the very fabric of reality.

Abzu · Post by **Abzu** » 02 Jun 2011, 22:55

[quote name="Verbal"]
[quote name=";,,;"]This has to be interesting from a psychological standpoint. He jumps at any criticism of Vincent with attacks at Tucker and the critics, then says Tucker isn't above criticism. There must be a disorder associated with this kind of jackassery.[/quote]

Disorders have been defined on less.

OMG he has "jumps at any criticism of Vincent with attacks at Tucker and the critics, then says Tucker isn't above criticism." syndrome. It's massively underrecognised and undertreated. What do you mean it's stupid? Look at this hard-on bearer here - he clearly has it! Since it was first described 10 seconds ago there has a remarkable increase in the bumber of cases - and this will probably increase as time goes on. As awareness of this afflictions becomes more widespread. Let's rebrand SSRIs and get a new patent as the new effective treatment for this awful condition. I suppose a multidisiplinary approach may work best. Lets ignore the fact that telling him he "has" this condition will make him do it more.[/quote]

Mesarthim · Post by **Mesarthim** » 02 Jun 2011, 22:56

well this thread took a turn for the worse.

jawn galliano · Post by **jawn galliano** » 02 Jun 2011, 22:58

i like to think i've made a significant contribution to that turn

Those Insane Gods · Post by **Those Insane Gods** » 02 Jun 2011, 23:04

[quote name=";,,;"]It was your line of reason behind your opinion -- the context of the citation; not the opinion itself. Re-read my post over and over until it sinks in. If you had said, "I THINK Tucker is/was a generic vocalist with close to no charisma brought in to make sure Trey would get his message across without any problems." in the first place, it would be a whole different story. There is no flawed reasoning there -- it is just an expression of an opinion. Do you see the difference? It is not very obscured.[/quote]

No I don't see the difference. I simply quoted another person. It was meant to be provocative yes, but your awkward and totally over the edge response was uncalled for.

Those Insane Gods · Post by **Those Insane Gods** » 02 Jun 2011, 23:07

[quote name="Derek Waters"]well in fairness when you do things like publicly laud david vincent's "masculine sexual charisma" it does make it sound like you are very literally sexually attracted to david vincent[/quote]

If you couldn't see the humor in that comment it's probably not worth the time trying to explain it.

jawn galliano · Post by **jawn galliano** » 02 Jun 2011, 23:09

um so you're deliberately provoking people and then failing to understand why people respond to you the way they do? am i reading this correctly?

Abzu · Post by **Abzu** » 02 Jun 2011, 23:14

[quote name="Those Insane Gods"]
[quote name=";,,;"]It was your line of reason behind your opinion -- the context of the citation; not the opinion itself. Re-read my post over and over until it sinks in. If you had said, "I THINK Tucker is/was a generic vocalist with close to no charisma brought in to make sure Trey would get his message across without any problems." in the first place, it would be a whole different story. There is no flawed reasoning there -- it is just an expression of an opinion. Do you see the difference? It is not very obscured.[/quote]

No I don't see the difference. I simply quoted another person. It was meant to be provocative yes, but your awkward and totally over the edge response was uncalled for.[/quote]

That you don't see the difference is just plain funny. That aside, you say it was meant to provoke reaction, but the reaction it provoked was uncalled for? You purposefully posted it to provoke a reaction. What, exactly, did you expect? Are you just flat out thick?

Those Insane Gods · Post by **Those Insane Gods** » 02 Jun 2011, 23:16

[quote name="Verbal"]
[quote name=";,,;"]This has to be interesting from a psychological standpoint. He jumps at any criticism of Vincent with attacks at Tucker and the critics, then says Tucker isn't above criticism. There must be a disorder associated with this kind of jackassery.[/quote]

Disorders have been defined on less.

OMG he has "jumps at any criticism of Vincent with attacks at Tucker and the critics, then says Tucker isn't above criticism." syndrome. It's massively underrecognised and undertreated. What do you mean it's stupid? Look at this hard-on bearer here - he clearly has it! Since it was first described 10 seconds ago there has a remarkable increase in the bumber of cases - and this will probably increase as time goes on. As awareness of this afflictions becomes more widespread. Let's rebrand SSRIs and get a new patent as the new effective treatment for this awful condition. I suppose a multidisiplinary approach may work best. Lets ignore the fact that telling him he "has" this condition will make him do it more.[/quote]

Let's turn this one around. What would you call an MABB member who constantly has the need to call anyone praising David Vincent a cocksucker? That's some pretty disturbing shit...

jawn galliano · Post by **jawn galliano** » 02 Jun 2011, 23:25

no if you'd pay attention actually its not 'anyone', its just that you specifically are indeed sexually attracted to david vincent

Those Insane Gods · Post by **Those Insane Gods** » 02 Jun 2011, 23:29

[quote name=";,,;"]
[quote name="Those Insane Gods"]
[quote name=";,,;"]It was your line of reason behind your opinion -- the context of the citation; not the opinion itself. Re-read my post over and over until it sinks in. If you had said, "I THINK Tucker is/was a generic vocalist with close to no charisma brought in to make sure Trey would get his message across without any problems." in the first place, it would be a whole different story. There is no flawed reasoning there -- it is just an expression of an opinion. Do you see the difference? It is not very obscured.[/quote]

No I don't see the difference. I simply quoted another person. It was meant to be provocative yes, but your awkward and totally over the edge response was uncalled for.[/quote]

That you don't see the difference is just plain funny. That aside, you say it was meant to provoke reaction, but the reaction it provoked was uncalled for? You purposefully posted it to provoke a reaction. What, exactly, did you expect? Are you just flat out thick?[/quote]

I thought you would have the intelligence to catch the irony. People here call David a salad bar all the time, so I thought it would be funny to write something like that. But I can now see that it was above your... Whatever. You simply didn't understand it, got provoked and went for the "YOU VINCENT FANBOY FUCKIN' COKKSUCKER!!1!" approach. Which was exactly what I was trying to make fun of. Pissed your pants there, but it's OK. Minor misunderstanding.

Those Insane Gods · Post by **Those Insane Gods** » 02 Jun 2011, 23:32

[quote name="Derek Waters"]no if you'd pay attention actually its not 'anyone', its just that you specifically are indeed sexually attracted to david vincent[/quote]

I'm genuinely surprised. I thought "homo-scare" was something you got over once you lost your virginity. But for some people that's apparently not the case.

^_____________^ · Post by **^_____________^** » 02 Jun 2011, 23:58

[quote name="Those Insane Gods"]
[quote name="Derek Waters"]no if you'd pay attention actually its not 'anyone', its just that you specifically are indeed sexually attracted to david vincent[/quote]

I'm genuinely surprised. I thought "homo-scare" was something you got over once you lost your virginity. But for some people that's apparently not the case.[/quote]

[quote name="Those Insane Gods"]Wotjek doesn't have Vincent's masculine sexual charisma though haha. He looks a little bit like a sexy leopard elevator in that second picture. Pretty cool pictures though.

[/quote]

Abzu · Post by **Abzu** » 03 Jun 2011, 00:09

Except it's not anyone (that would be some interesting self-flagellation, considering I also give Mr. Vincent his due praise) it is you. It is reactionary to how you approach it and nearly everything else when you post here. Oh, but of course, it must be over my head. I forgot how incredibly superior you are to the rest of the members here.

Your posturing is pointless here; you're not fooling anyone, you thick fuck.

Those Insane Gods · Post by **Those Insane Gods** » 03 Jun 2011, 00:10

I was watching the video clip for Blessed Are The Sick with a fellating lover of mine and David's copulation-like dance moves gave us a good laugh. I didn't realize a comment like that would scare people out of their homo-frightened pants. I'm wiser now.

Abzu · Post by **Abzu** » 03 Jun 2011, 00:16

It's rather entertaining how you make these asinine assumptions. Your statement about Vincent's "male sexual charisma" which was jokingly linked with your figurative fellating of the man, absolutely must be an outbreak of homophobia! The way you arbitrarily attribute these things brings denialism to new and wondrous heights!

Those Insane Gods · Post by **Those Insane Gods** » 03 Jun 2011, 00:19

[quote name=";,,;"]Except it's not anyone (that would be some interesting self-flagellation, considering I also give Mr. Vincent his due praise) it is you. It is reactionary to how you approach it and nearly everything else when you post here. Oh, but of course, it must be over my head. I forgot how incredibly superior you are to the rest of the members here.

Your posturing is pointless here; you're not fooling anyone, you thick fuck.[/quote]

[quote name=";,,;"]It's rather entertaining how you make these asinine assumptions. Your statement about Vincent's "male sexual charisma" which was jokingly linked with your figurative fellating of the man, absolutely must be an outbreak of homophobia! The way you arbitrarily attribute these things brings denialism to new and wondrous heights![/quote]

It's funny how some people have too much pride to write an apology.

Abzu · Post by **Abzu** » 03 Jun 2011, 00:23

Your hollow arrogance know no bounds. No apology will be forthcoming because there is no apology necessary. It has nothing to do with pride. Are you seriously that fucking thick?! This must be base trolling. No one is this stupid.

^_____________^ · Post by **^_____________^** » 03 Jun 2011, 00:23

[quote name="Those Insane Gods"]I was watching the video clip for Blessed Are The Sick with a fellating lover of mine and David's copulation-like dance moves gave us a good laugh. I didn't realize a comment like that would scare people out of their homo-frightened pants. I'm wiser now.

[/quote]

Pointing out the reason why we think you're actually gay makes us homophobic? If I saw a hard-on bearer sucking another hard-on bearer's dick and said "Hey, I think those guys are gay" would that make me homophobic too? Or would I only be homophobic if I screamed and looked away like I'd been burned? I don't think I did that here, and I don't understand how my post would make me homophobic. I think the real homophobe is the one who feels the need to start throwing that term around in the first place, because you're the first one to do it.

I'M NOT ACTUALLY GAY, YOU'RE JUST HOMOPHOBIC YOU FUCKING IDIOT!!!!!!!!!!!!111111111111111 ONE ONE ONE

[quote name=";,,;"]Your hollow arrogance know no bounds. No apology will be forthcoming because there is no apology necessary. It has nothing to do with pride. Are you seriously that fucking thick?! This must be base trolling. No one is this stupid.[/quote]

WTSL is sure good at turning civilized discussions into childish arguments.

For the record, if someone accused me of being gay, I would just say yes because I don't give a shit.

Verbal · Post by **Verbal** » 03 Jun 2011, 00:26

Stop posting responses to him and just ban him for fuck's sake.

jawn galliano · Post by **jawn galliano** » 03 Jun 2011, 00:26

man i ain't scared of gays, i got one cleaning my kitchen as we speak

Abzu · Post by **Abzu** » 03 Jun 2011, 00:27

[quote name="Verbal"]Stop posting responses to him and just ban him for fuck's sake.[/quote]

Yeah, I'm done with this thick fucking cunt. His trolling idiocy is not worth my time.

:ban:

^_____________^ · Post by **^_____________^** » 03 Jun 2011, 00:28

Verbal · Post by **Verbal** » 03 Jun 2011, 00:29

[quote name="Derek Waters"]man i ain't scared of gays, i got one cleaning my kitchen as we speak[/quote]

Those Insane Gods · Post by **Those Insane Gods** » 03 Jun 2011, 00:30

[quote name=";,,;"]Your hollow arrogance know no bounds. No apology will be forthcoming because there is no apology necessary. It has nothing to do with pride. Are you seriously that fucking thick?! This must be base trolling. No one is this stupid.[/quote]

How could I ever fool someone as smart as you? I bet you knew about my streamy homo-dreams before I even wrote my first post... You really got me there.

Abzu · Post by **Abzu** » 03 Jun 2011, 00:30

Oh right! Didn't your gay maid eat your food or something?

^_____________^ · Post by **^_____________^** » 03 Jun 2011, 00:30

[quote name="Those Insane Gods"]
[quote name=";,,;"]Your hollow arrogance know no bounds. No apology will be forthcoming because there is no apology necessary. It has nothing to do with pride. Are you seriously that fucking thick?! This must be base trolling. No one is this stupid.[/quote]

How could I ever fool someone as smart as you? I bet you knew about my streamy homo-dreams before I even wrote my first post... You really got me there.

[/quote]

I have steamy homo dreams. Do you want to take part in some of them? I'll suck your dick off.

jawn galliano · Post by **jawn galliano** » 03 Jun 2011, 00:33

[quote name=";,,;"]Oh right! Didn't your gay maid eat your food or something?[/quote]

nah but he did throw a bunch of it out like a month or so back. so, i will amend my previous statement: i am in fact afraid of a specific gay throwin' out my food

droidspawn · Post by **droidspawn** » 03 Jun 2011, 00:33

Ok, someone lock this fucking thread already for the love of christ.

jawn galliano · Post by **jawn galliano** » 03 Jun 2011, 00:34

i just want to make sure i'm clear here, 'throwin' out my food' is not a euphemism for 'havin' gay sex with me'

Those Insane Gods · Post by **Those Insane Gods** » 03 Jun 2011, 00:35

We all know who started this. Even those who aren't willing to admit it.

Thanks for a fun read people. I'm done with this as opposed to those who claim to be but keep posting. They apparently can't get enough of that "thick fucking cunt".

Verbal · Post by **Verbal** » 03 Jun 2011, 00:36

food: prepare to be thrown out by gay maid

Abzu · Post by **Abzu** » 03 Jun 2011, 00:42

[quote name="Derek Waters"]i just want to make sure i'm clear here, 'throwin' out my food' is not a euphemism for 'havin' gay sex with me'[/quote]

Oh right right that was it. He threw a bunch of it away. TELL ME someone made a 'tossed your salad' joke in your household. +10 if the maid made the joke.

TamPron · Post by **TamPron** » 03 Jun 2011, 02:55

I wish to post pictures of my nipples in this thread.

^_____________^ · Post by **^_____________^** » 03 Jun 2011, 03:09

[quote name="COCK BALLS PUBE TITS"]I wish to post pictures of my nipples in this thread.[/quote]

bob_here · Post by **bob_here** » 03 Jun 2011, 03:29

[quote name="Those Insane Gods"]
[quote name="COCK BALLS PUBE devy's clits"]I talked to tucker recently on the facebook...New project with flo underway, 4 songs written.

[/quote]

It's already out and it's called Nader Sadek (the name of an Egyptian hipster who made stage props for Sunn and Gayhem). Tucker apparently doesn't have the imagination to come up with a band himself. But it isn't bad musically. Decent Morbid Angel rip-off.[/quote]

Interesting. You assert that they are a Morbid Angel rip-off. Yet, they don't sound like this slab of crap on Illud. But you love illud and adhere to the point that it is MA. Yet again, your branding of what MA is has been put forth by assuming another band who doesn't sound like anything on Illud to be an MA rip-off. Therefore you percieve MA to be in the same musical camp as Sadek to be calling Sadek "an MA rip-off". So what is it exactly that you praise of Illud? It's not that it's MA afterall is it, you prove that in your contradiction. You love it for some other ball licking reason. You are indeed a troll or somebody with a tenious perception of what heavy music is supposed to be.

Hallucinating dead · Post by **Hallucinating dead** » 03 Jun 2011, 03:35

not even a single riff in "In the Flesh" album is similar to any morbid angel album.

Tyreese BIGGUMS · Post by **Tyreese BIGGUMS** » 03 Jun 2011, 03:38

[quote name="TranscendingMusic"]
[quote name="Those Insane Gods"]
[quote name="COCK BALLS PUBE devy's clits"]I talked to tucker recently on the facebook...New project with flo underway, 4 songs written.

[/quote]

It's already out and it's called Nader Sadek (the name of an Egyptian hipster who made stage props for Sunn and Gayhem). Tucker apparently doesn't have the imagination to come up with a band himself. But it isn't bad musically. Decent Morbid Angel rip-off.[/quote]

Interesting. You assert that they are a Morbid Angel rip-off. Yet, they don't sound like this slab of crap on Illud. But you love illud and adhere to the point that it is MA. Yet again, your branding of what MA is has been put forth by assuming another band who doesn't sound like anything on Illud to be an MA rip-off. Therefore you percieve MA to be in the same musical camp as Sadek to be calling Sadek "an MA rip-off". So what is it exactly that you praise of Illud? It's not that it's MA afterall is it, you prove that in your contradiction. You love it for some other ball licking reason. You are indeed a troll or somebody with a tenious perception of what heavy music is supposed to be.[/quote]

honestly, rune's compositions and riffs sound absolutely nothing like trey's, nor does flo's drumming sound like pete's. basically the only thing that's the same is tucker doing vocals/lyrics. so it really isn't a morbid angel ripoff at all. this guys a dolt, he needs to be banned already

^_____________^ · Post by **^_____________^** » 03 Jun 2011, 03:39

[quote name="TranscendingMusic"]
[quote name="Those Insane Gods"]
[quote name="COCK BALLS PUBE devy's clits"]I talked to tucker recently on the facebook...New project with flo underway, 4 songs written.

[/quote]

It's already out and it's called Nader Sadek (the name of an Egyptian hipster who made stage props for Sunn and Gayhem). Tucker apparently doesn't have the imagination to come up with a band himself. But it isn't bad musically. Decent Morbid Angel rip-off.[/quote]

Interesting. You assert that they are a Morbid Angel rip-off. Yet, they don't sound like this slab of crap on Illud. But you love illud and adhere to the point that it is MA. Yet again, your branding of what MA is has been put forth by assuming another band who doesn't sound like anything on Illud to be an MA rip-off. Therefore you percieve MA to be in the same musical camp as Sadek to be calling Sadek "an MA rip-off". So what is it exactly that you praise of Illud? It's not that it's MA afterall is it, you prove that in your contradiction. You love it for some other ball licking reason. You are indeed a troll or somebody with a tenious perception of what heavy music is supposed to be.[/quote]

Hallucinating dead · Post by **Hallucinating dead** » 03 Jun 2011, 03:42

I dont know how come he is not banned yet

vO)))id · Post by **vO)))id** » 03 Jun 2011, 04:33

Uhmm yeah, I'm completely done with this fool.

Abzu · Post by **Abzu** » 03 Jun 2011, 04:36

[quote name="lava Ghoul"]I dont know how come he is not banned yet

[/quote]

Dusty's sense of humor?

agony bagony · Post by **agony bagony** » 03 Jun 2011, 16:40

i dont read all the threads in this forum

also i am totally fucking nominating steamy homo dreams for grindy grind